| |
In this
article, I detailed some fundamental methodologies for propagating
corals, and so it stands to reason that an article on methods for
securing the resulting divisions follows suit. For many ambitious
coral farmers, propagating corals can be summed up with a flip utterance,
"Saw it, fragged it… licked the salt off my hands!"
Well… that, of course, is a ridiculous statement. I would
never personally condone such an unsanitary act without lemon wedges
and a fifth of top shelf tequila. But, enough about how I personally
propagate coral. Here, I intend to proffer advice and wisdom to
aquarists on some of the most popular methods for attaching fragments
of coral to a hard substrate.
Methods for securing hard or soft
coral are likely to fall within one of the following categories:
-
plastic ties, rubber bands, wire or thread, stitches, suspension
-
cyanoacrylate/super glue
-
cementing and epoxying
-
collars, cups, netting, tubes and pipe, rock crevices and corrals
-
drilling, pegging, spearing
- on live rock, sand, ceramic tiles/glass, in rubble
troughs, etc.
Tethering corals by tying, banding
or stitching might be the most effective method for securing the
broadest range of propagated hard or soft corals with reasonable
to very good rates of success. It almost assures sound mooring of
coral divisions the first time. In contrast, glues and epoxies,
for example, may require occasional to frequent re-application (as
with heavily mucous species and others with more fickle changes
in their hydrated mass from polyp cycles). Nylon thread (or monofilament
fishing line), natural rubber bands and plastic cable ties (AKA
"zip ties") are the most common fasteners. Indeed, there
are many imaginative varieties of fasteners applied to coral by
farming aquarists. Even when aesthetically unattractive, fasteners
are usually a temporary solution while waiting for subsequent natural
attachment of a new fragment. They will be overgrown or unnecessary
(and can be removed) after a modest wait for new coral tissue to
anchor the division.
Of all the many ways listed above
(and beyond) for fixing newly fragmented divisions, stitching with
plastic thread or wire is one of the fastest, safest and surest
ways of securing corals. Most soft coral that are fragmented can
be stitched with a needle and plastic thread with little effort
or time. If you are willing to drill a small thread hole in scleractinian
skeletal mass, many stony corals can be fixed quite assuredly in
like fashion (and it gives you another reason to get out the electric
rotary tool!). Corals stitched with one or two threads through the
stalk and tied off to a hard piece of rock or rubble are surely
secured. They cannot be lost to volume changes of the fragment due
to polyp expansion and contraction. Neither can they be easily displaced
by water currents, or by the activities of fish and motile invertebrates.
Indeed, a soft coral fragment may shrink away from glue or epoxy.
Likewise, it can be carried by currents out of and away from collars,
cups and troughs, but a stitch through the trunk of an octocoral
provides a secure anchorage. This method may be done as quickly
or faster than any other method of attachment for coral frags, and
I highly recommend it for heavily mucous species that will not tolerate
either excessive handling or widely constrictive fasteners. Indeed,
stitching is one of the surest ways to attach "difficult"
settling species such as green and yellow "finger and toadstool
leathers", Sarcophyton and Sinularia, as well as Klyxum (AKA
"Colt" coral… formerly Alcyonium), Cladiella and
Neptheids. Common, branching soft corals in general respond very
well to stitching.
Using a needle, fine plastic thread
(nylon sewing thread or clean fishing line) is readily available
to most any aquarist, easily applied and has he added benefit of
affording reduced handling time of corals. Fastening can be conducted
under water and requires no additional preparatory steps. The pictures
below are hardly instructional; the act of sewing a coral to a piece
of rock is rather self-explanatory. Instead they are proffered for
encouragement that the application of a stitch to fasten a coral
to a rock really is as straightforward as it seems. The photos also
serve as a reminder why heavily mucous species of coral are best
served by stitching. Please note the heavily viscous mucus issued
from this soft coral in mere seconds after the imposed fragmentation!
Clearly, this animal could not be handled easily without an instrument
like tweezers. Such heavily mucous species obviously cannot be superglued
or epoxied to a dry substrate. Even if they could, I propose that
when a brief stitch is applied so quickly and with little intrusion,
it is a preferred method of attaching soft corals to hard substrates.
 |
| When handling heavily
mucous species, like this Xenia, it is very important to
avoid contacting tissue with bare hands. Excessive handling
stimulates the production of mucus which increases the proliferation
of bacteria that may become pathogenic. |
While a discreet stitch is the least invasive
method for tethering a fragmented coral, elastic natural rubber
bands are also effective fasteners too. They are used to hold a
coral division in place against a hard substrate ("live rock",
corallum, ceramic, plastic, aragonite, etc.) while waiting for natural
attachment of the division. A healthy coral will usually generate
sufficient new tissue within a few weeks to anchor the specimen.
A natural rubber band will rather conveniently dissolve in seawater
in less than a month, sparing the appreciative farming aquarist
the need to remove it. The elasticity of rubber bands allows them
to ride the fluctuating volume of coral tissue through inflating
and deflating polyp cycles before the division becomes firmly anchored.
Some aquarists like to sandwich a fragment between two small pieces
of substrate, while others simply band a division against a single
piece of rubble or like medium. Sandwiched divisions need to be
oriented in such a manner as to receive maximum water flow and light,
while still being held securely. An appropriately sized thin rubber
band will just barely constrict a fragment to prevent dislocation
with the currents. Thicker bands deprive a division of normal diffusive
functions over a greater surface area (under the band) and slightly
increase mortality and infection from anoxia and increased mucus.
An elastic band that is too tight will sharply constrict a fragment
and may actually cut through a division successfully before the
fragment has a chance to attach. This means that two fragments instead
of one will be lost, blowing around an aquarium with the currents!
Unpigmented, natural rubber bands are harmless and non-toxic. They
may not be pretty, but they are inexpensive, easy to apply and remove
quickly and may be used on a majority of popular hard and soft corals
with reasonable to good success for attachment. In grossly generalized
terms, SPS and weakly mucous soft corals respond quite favorably
to such banding while LPS, zoantharians and heavily mucous soft
corals do not.
Scleractinian species, and many
octocorals, are more suitably affixed to a hard substrate by simply
tying them to it with non-elastic fasteners like plastic cable/"zip"
ties or nylon filament. This is due to the unyielding rigidity of
the scleractinian's corallum that prevents any displacement of the
animal under an inflexible tie. Soft corals suitable for tying are
those not quickly changeable in volume from "hydration"/polyp
expansion and usually have large, densely fused spicules which lend
necessary rigidity to their form, for example, Nepthyigorgia "chili
corals", some Sinularia and Dendronephthya. Even non-scleractinians
such as Heliopora and Millepora respond favorably to this simple
method of securing a division and can quickly overgrow a thread
to look quite natural in form after a short time. As with rubber
bands, because of the reasons listed above, thinner is better when
used to simply tie down a fragmented division of coral. Plastic
cable ties are also used to facilitate a compound attachment, in
some octocorals where the tie is used to slowly constrict and pinch
off a soft coral division, which attaches to the fastener before
the separation is complete. After the branchlet finally drops, the
attached fastener serves, at the very least, as a handle to avoid
touching the new division. It may be attached to a permanent substrate
by gluing to or threading the tie through a hard surface, or simply
weighting down a tethered fragment. Cable ties are effective but
cumbersome and unsightly for most SPS corals. Fine nylon thread
or monofilament line is likely to be more aesthetically discreet.
Cable ties may be quite useful, however, to secure LPS corals by
drilling an inconspicuous region of the skeleton to thread plastic
ties through like stitching rockwork. As with the use of rubber
bands, temporarily fastening coral by tying it with plastic straps/ties
or thread may not be pretty, but it is effective.
Glues and epoxies are marketed
heavily and are popularly employed in coral propagation, but not
all truly adhere corals to a medium. Adhesion is the formation of
a bond between two surfaces: "sticking together", one
might say. Cyanoacrylate glue is one of the few "glues"
in coral propagation that properly fits this description. In contrast,
epoxies, cements and hot glues more accurately capture corals by
pouring in form (or being molded in form) around a specimen and
then curing hard to hold a fragment in place. They do not, however,
actually "stick" to living tissue in a proper bond like
cyanoacrylate glue can.
(superglue) has been heralded like the eighth wonder of the world
for attaching coral categorically. Many aquarists read in aquarium
literature and hear about the convenience of using this product,
but experience with it is often met with frustration, disappointment
and a lost coral fragment blowing around the aquarium. Quite frankly,
I do not understand or agree with all of the hubbub surrounding
this technique especially as it pertains to species other than SPS
scleractinians. I have handled many thousands of fragmented divisions
of soft and hard coral (secured with various techniques), and find
the process of gluing with cyanoacrylate to be tedious, at best,
for many popular coral species. I have listened to more aquarists
than not complain through the years about difficulties with utilizing
this technique that really cannot be attributed to procedural faults.
Defenders maintain that there is a very specific protocol (that
is ironically quite variable among the defenders) for attaching
soft corals with cyanoacrylate glue. Please forgive me, but I am
just not willing to buy into the hype of a ten-step procedure for
getting super glue to set that involves a Tibetan Sherpa, a stick
of chewing gum and a roll of duct tape. Indeed, I am exaggerating
here for the purpose of a bit of humor, but still I mean to relate
that the application of cyanoacrylate glues to living coral is often
misunderstood or misapplied by aquarists. The time required to apply
such glue is no faster than a simple elastic band or tie/stitch
and it certainly is not as reliable (where a stitch works the first
time, every time… cyanoacrylate may need to be re-applied).
As super as it may be around the household, it is not a universal
adhesive for most or even many corals. Cyanoacrylate glue can indeed
be very useful for some coral like SPS species, but it is ultimately
very challenging to employ with many other corals. It seems to work
best with surfaces (living or not) that can easily be patted dry
and handled out of water for some time without suffering or secreting
much mucus, such as the broken edge and exposed corallum of stony
corals, the woody gorgonin stem of a gorgonian and the rough surfaces
of many "leather" corals. These are very fine places to
which one may easily and successfully bond cyanoacrylate glue to
another surface. One of my favorite applications of cyanoacrylate
glue is upon the underside of stoloniferous corals ("mat"
formed like Star polyps) for setting sheets of living coral in place
upon the aquarium's vertical back and side walls (temporarily drop
water level to do this). Other artifacts of the aquarium system
like plumbing/pipes and overflow wells may be covered in like kind
with a living veil of coral by cyanoacrylate glue. Yet, other corals
still, like individual zoantharians (button polyps or mushrooms
anemones) and "slimy"/mucous corals like "Colt"
coral (Klyxum), are very challenging to secure anywhere with cyanoacrylate
and are best anchored by other means. With the intention of trying
to keep this article shorter than the preamble to the Constitution
<G>, let me direct aquarists interested in learning more about
the various subtleties for properly applying cyanoacrylate glue
abroad onto the internet and more specifically to a wonderful site
for aquarists: GARF.
For aquarists not familiar with the work of Leroy and Sally Jo Headlee,
their site is filled with an enormous amount of very useful and
instructional content in articles, images and video on a wide range
of topics embracing reef aquarium science. Know that there are likely
more than a few ways to successfully apply cyanoacrylate glue to
live coral for settlement.
As mentioned above, epoxies, cements
and hot glues are used primarily to capture coral within the hardened
(cured) constraints of a poured or molded form. Some popular products
include two-part underwater epoxy, dental cement, hydraulic cement
(expanding/fast-setting), and even common Portland cement. They
do not actually adhere to coral tissue, although this does not make
them any gentler on living tissue. Their chemical curing processes,
while hardening, may be irritating to some coral and fish. By and
large they are safe to use, but some fish and coral have demonstrated
severe and even rare fatal reactions to these applications in seawater.
For most aquarists practicing good aquarium husbandry, such as water
exchanges, protein skimming and good chemical filtration especially
after coral propagating events, problems will be very rare with
such products. Naturally, anecdotal reports about deleterious reactions
do not oblige manufacturers to disclose warnings with products or
packaging. Aquarists with small-scaled and scaleless fishes (firefish,
mandarins, lionfish, etc. as well as sharks, skates and rays) should
already be conscientious of the sensitivities of such fishes overall
to medications, metals, additives, etcetera in their charge, and
demonstrate due preparedness in aquarium husbandry. Disclaimer aside,
securing corals to a substrate with cement and epoxies can be quite
useful and safe in many applications.
I have used underwater epoxy and
cement in various applications and find it to be quite useful for
many aspects of aquariology such as securing rock, or coral. It
is especially helpful with coral and structures in need of a stronger
union as with larger divisions of coral or those to be anchored
in areas of dynamic water flow. Indeed, such cements are appropriate
for the more substantial needs of gluing large rocks and corals,
and as such have their place in the hobby. My only reservation for
using such products on a larger scale than home aquarist or backyard/basement
coral farmer is that the epoxies are too expensive and the cements
are too labor-intensive to be useful in commercial endeavors.
The application of each product
varies, but in gross terms, a portion of cement or epoxy is necessarily
forced into cracks and crevices on an irregular surface such as
live rock. Smooth surfaces are less likely to form good bonds once
cured. By penetrating into irregular surfaces, these products can
harden to form very strong, finger like grips on substrates. Before
curing, a division of coral is pressed into the medium with some
of the cement or epoxy molded up and around the fragment if possible
to help capture/curb it. The hardening time varies with each product,
but is generally less than fifteen minutes and can often be completed
under water. Full curing may take up to 48 hours. To prevent any
deleterious curing byproducts from entering the "home"
tank, it may be helpful to allow the curing to complete in a remote
holding vessel, such as like a water bath.
Securing
corals by methods of containment can involve positioning many different
items to create a barrier. Aquarists have learned to become quite
inventive by necessity while pioneering coral farming techniques.
 |
| A tremendous collection
of corallimorphs in a mature reef display at the National
Aquarium in Baltimore. This aquarium has been operating
for over 13 years. |
Common materials for this
purpose may include: PVC collars/pipe segments, plastic cups, shallow
glass jars, plastic or nylon netting (like rain gutter guard, bridal
veil, fruit mesh, etc.), clear plastic tubes, floral picks, and
even holes drilled in rock or other substrates. Some aquarists arrange
small pieces of scleractinian rubble around coral in wait for attachment
in a fashion that might resemble rocks around a campfire. This method
is also used to contain a vigorous or overgrowing species of coral
from encroachment on neighboring cnidarians. Millepora, encrusting
and stoloniferous corals like Star polyps, zoanthids like yellow
polyps/anemones, and Xeniids are just some of the many fast growing
cnidarians sometimes in need of being kept at bay, so to speak,
by just such a rubble "firewall". Even a cursory glance
on the Internet will reveal these and many other useful methods
of containment for fragmented and unsecured corals.
The goal of containment is
to reduce disturbances from water flow or macro-organisms pending
natural attachment while affording maximum and hopefully unfiltered
illumination in the process. Such methods can be highly recommended
for commercial and small-scale operations alike, as materials for
containment are generally inexpensive or reusable and have little
impact on operational expenses.
Some of the most dynamic effects
in reef gardening can be made with containment techniques. PVC collars
and clear tubes can be used, for example, to trap coral fragments
on the rockscape in precarious and dramatic locations. One of the
most popular exploitations of this technique is to place various
colored zoantharians (colored button polyps or mushroom anemones)
in a wild array of colors in relative close proximity. A veritable
living rainbow of color. Likewise, various corals may be settled
on the facial/vertical edges of great spanning arches or atop the
overhang of a cave, for example, all with the strategic placement
of lift tubes and collars as methods of containment. Short segments
of pipe can effectively restrict lateral movement in areas of low
to moderate current and situated on relatively level planes. Longer
sections of clear pipe/tube are cut at similar angles to match the
targeted rock (or glass) surfaces and will be necessary for vertical
surfaces and planes. In such cases, with a propped length of clear
lift tube (say, 1" or larger) projecting from the surface of
the water (perhaps resting on the edge of the aquarium), the coral
fragment is dropped into the tube to fall guided with gravity to
the targeted location in the aquarium below. Notches or holes may
need to be cut into the lower region of the tube to afford better
water circulation while still containing the fragment diffusively.
Please notice the picture of mushroom corallimorphs attractively
crowded on a sheer vertical rock face below that can be created
with such applications.
 |
| Natural settlement
on coarse substrates like crushed coral, aragonite or broken
shell is commonly employed in commercial operations as an
inexpensive and successful method for securing coral. Open
rubble troughs and species specific displays are preferable
to cups, netting, mesh, veil and the like that may be an
impediment to water flow and light for settling coral. |
Aesthetics aside, the practical
application of securing techniques by containment can simply involve
cups or jars. Plastic or glass vessels may be partially filled with
aggregate (crushed rock, coarse sand, bio-rubble, etc.) to contain
freshly fragmented divisions of coral for settlement. This method
is commonly employed in organized coral propagation such as commercial
farming and large-scale local trade. In commercial coral farming,
coarse aragonite filled cups are packed onto suspended shelves or
tables in shallow, inexpensively lit, growout vessels. Optimum light
and moderate water flow will bathe the culturing cups, and divisions
can be systematically grown, graded and cycled through them. Aggregate
is replaced as necessary, since occupying fragments export bits
of substrate with natural attachment and their sale out of the system.
One of the most popular forms
of containment in the commercial propagation of corals is floral
piks and pre-formed plugs with piloted holes. The fabrication of
plugs is somewhat time-consuming, and more appropriate for aquarists
seeking a natural looking substrate for cultured fragments in local
trade and small-scale operations. Plugs are usually formed with
a calcareous aggregate of crushed coral, coral sand, aragonite,
or shell mixed with limestone/cement. Once cured, it is a fine method
for attaching coral, but labor intensive for commercial mariculture.
Curing for use in aquarium systems
may require etching with a weak acid or soaking the raw, cement
product for some time in freshwater especially if many newly formed
plugs are to be added to a system at once. For-profit endeavors
often use a favorite of mine, floral piks, which are short plastic
tubes with a rubber cap commonly used to hold fresh cut flower stems
and corsages. They can often be inexpensively obtained from a local
florist or wholesale sources. Please
notice the photographs below depicting new, encrusted dry and encrusted
living floral piks. The piks are usually green and quite conspicuous,
which helps coral farmers clearly evidence the cultured nature of
their product for expeditious and
lawful export of CITES regulated animals abroad. The rubber caps
are flexible and adjustable to hold a wide range of fragment sizes.
And, consumers should have little concern
about the aesthetics
 |
| Floral piks are an
ideal artificial tool for culture and shipping SPS fragments,
and can be ordered from a local florist for mere pennies.
They are inexpensive, adaptable and serve commercial interests
admirably in evidence of the conspicuous aquacultured nature
of the product when shipping controlled species abroad.
Center image depicts the growth of an immature Pocillopora
fragment fully down the body of the pik. |
of this application as healthy corals quickly
and easily encrust the caps of the floral pik bodies, when most
of the artifact is usually hidden in the rockscape anyway. The uniform
and discreet size of each floral pik also affords the coral farmer
great control over aggression in placement of specimens in growout.
In a most elementary application,
simple holes may be drilled in the rocks with an electric drill
and a masonry bit, or natural crevices can be utilized just the
same. Corals are simply inserted or wedged into the recess. Obviously,
there is little production cost to utilize this method of containment.
Unfortunately, it is the least reliable method when unassisted as
fragments can be blown away by currents or moved by creatures. Piloted
holes are more useful for holding corals cultured in solidly encrusted
narrow tubes or floral picks. However, more than a few years ago,
Dick Perrin of Tropicorium, demonstrated an interesting and useful
modification of this technique. Mr. Perrin gave a great demonstration
on a gentle technique for attaching gorgonians where he inserted
fragmented divisions of gorgonians into holes in calcareous rock
that were slightly bigger than the diameter of the animal's base.
Incidentally, the base of the gorgonian was prepared by stripping
away ¼-1/2 inch of tissue to expose the woody gorgonin stem,
thereby reducing the chance of infection from the forcibly stifled
living tissue. Divisions were then held in place with a tapered
wedge of firm Styrofoam inserted with the base of the gorgonian
into the rock. For coral farmers shipping and receiving live aquatic
animals, Styrofoam is in abundance and broken pieces may be recycled,
at least in a small quantity, in this manner. There are indeed many
other effective ways of naturally containing fragmented divisions
of coral in wait for natural attachment.
Impaling corals is a remarkably
simple, if not crude, method of securing both hard and soft coral.
In essence, only the living tissue of soft corals is actually impaled.
LPS corals simply have their skeletons drilled for pegs (or stitches),
but their living tissue is usually untouched. Thin, solid, acrylic
rod is fitted in holes drilled through or up into (depending on
the desired orientation of the subject) a scleractinian "skeleton"
(corallum) for attachment to a reef structure. Pegs do not need
to be large or conspicuous, as this methodology is sturdy and rigid
for securing stony corals. Exposed facets of the hardware will soon
be covered with benthic organisms such as sponge or coralline algae.
Pegs may be glued in place or merely set in a snug fit. SPS corals
are not usually impaled in any manner, as any of several other methods
of securing them will invariably suit a given specimen better. Almost
any soft coral or zoantharian that can be successfully fragmented
can be impaled safely.
Impaling is often conducted with
a plastic toothpick or cocktail pick. Other spears are safe and
appropriate if made of food grade plastics. Wooden and stainless
steel picks have been used by aquarists but really do not need mention
or recommendation when plastic picks are so commonly available.
Picks with a handle or flared end will help to prevent a fragment
from sliding or expanding off of the toothpick. Aquarists, no doubt,
can use their imagination for alternatives. Success is often hampered
by water flow or movement of picks within shallow holes or crevices.
As an improvement on this concept, the plastic pick can pass equally
through the stalk of a soft coral (extending out from either side)
to permit gluing or (rubber) banding of the ends of the pick to
rubble to lend weight and absolutely contain the impaled coral.
Impaling is a relatively harmless method of securing fragments of
coral, since only a small and single puncture is imposed on the
division. Many notable aquarists such as Daniel Knop have described
this technique of attachment for propagated corals for aquarists.
Impaling, although not especially graceful or delicate, is one of
the few reliably successful methods for attaching heavily mucous
soft corals when faster and less conspicuous methods of attachment
are not feasible. The tiny spiculed, "slimy" Sinularia
species (like Green or Yellow Finger corals), Klyxum and Cladiella
"Colt" corals, Xeniids and even corallimorphs respond
well to this technique. After a few days when the fragment seems
to be adequately attached, the pick can be removed by first spinning
it in place (rolling the pick between the fingers) to ensure that
withdrawal will not pull the newly attached fragment off of the
substrate if stuck to the pick. Impaling "leathery" soft
corals, including Sarcophyton and Sinularia species, can be done
as easily and with even greater survivability. Neptheids respond
only moderately well to this technique. Impaling is not convenient
for most gorgonians and stoloniferous corals. Zoanthids respond
very poorly to this technique and may exude damaging amounts of
noxious compounds in defense of the molestation. Research on the
viability and tolerance of corals suffering such imposed techniques
of propagation and settlement is necessary for good aquarium science;
please record and share your results with other aquarists.
Natural attachment is defined
here as the encouragement of unassisted, or at least unimposed,
attachment of coral tissue to natural or artificial substrates.
Substrates for securing corals naturally are about as varied as
one can imagine. Some popular surfaces include live rock, crushed
live rock, bio-rubble, crushed coral, various grades of aragonite
sand, snail and clamshells, and ceramic tile. Parent corals with
little or
 |
| Bio-rubble filled
growout containers in Dick Perrin's coral farming wonderland,
Tropicorium… Romulus, MI. |
no tolerance to handling
or propagation can be established instead in a dedicated rubble
trough and encouraged to grow out to maturity. In time, they will
begin branchlet dropping or may permit limited asexual fragmentation.
Successful divisions can then simply be dropped to the floor of
the rubble trough for settlement and growout. In my opinion, it
is one of the very best methods of attaching coral fragments for
coral farmers who can afford the time and space to conduct the activity
in dedicated culturing vessels. One
of the very best materials for securing divisions in coral propagation
by natural attachment is "bio-rubble". Bio-rubble
is the inevitable by-product of live rock imported and shipped domestically.
Very small pieces of this scleractinian product occur in small to
significant quantities in shipments of live rock that move into
and about the country every day. It is not uncommon for up to 10
percent of a shipment of live rock to be crushed or broken into
small or tiny pieces that are useless for the collected purpose
of rockscaping. Since this bio-rubble is too small to use for decorating,
but too large for use as filtration media (it traps detritus excessively
without effective pre-filtration), it is usually discarded by importers
and other resellers of live rock. Aquarists are encouraged to court
local resellers of live rock products for such rubble that may be
used in coral propagation for local trade. In many cases, a kind
retailer may be inclined to save the fragments of live rock from
weekly shipments for local coral farmers to use in exchange for
considerations on supplied, propagated coral. In any case, bio-rubble
should be available inexpensively, as it has little or no other
market value. The caveat for this practice is directed towards international
shippers of propagated coral. To send propagated coral out of the
country soon or in the future, it may be necessary to culture reef
invertebrates on conspicuously artificial substrates instead to
demonstrate the captive bred nature of the product in the face of
increasing legislation on the trade of wild harvested and CITES
protected stony corals.
Having described some of the most
popular methods for securing propagated corals, let me offer some
wisdom in a general overview of the activity:
There can be a tremendous range
of tolerance and sensitivity to various aspects of coral propagation
regarding handling, cutting and attaching corals even among species
within the same genus. Research a candidate thoroughly when information
is possible about such techniques, and report your findings when
such information is not available. Please give your knowledge as
freely as you take it.
Avoid touching live coral tissue
whenever possible and wear a clean glove when it is not. Increased
handling time decreases survivability by mitigating deleterious
factors (increased mucus production, creating abrasions or wounds
that invite infection, etc.)
Frequent movement of new/unsettled
divisions, especially on a vertical scale, dramatically increases
the risk of mortality. Put a fragment in a good and secure place
for growout the first time and leave it alone! Movement of a young
and stressed division that forces the expenditure of limited and
strained sources of energy to compensate for changes in lighting
and other life supporting parameters is dangerous and irresponsible.
Asexually fragmented divisions
demonstrate higher survivability if attached to a substrate for
growout at a level of illumination that is the same or slightly
lower than the donor. Lateral moves within the system are generally
safe. Such propagation is especially easy to accomplish in dedicated
systems for coral farming with deliberate shelves or static water
depths for the terrain (like a monospecific rubble trough for parents
and cultured divisions).
Most propagated divisions of coral
will attach and growout more successfully without competition from
neighboring coral/cnidarians. Farming that must be done in mixed
species displays can reduce the impact of chemical aggression by
propagating only one or just a couple of species at a time. Otherwise,
numerous specimens/species of freshly cut corals will dramatically
increase the "toxic soup" from the inevitable duress.
Ideally, farming corals is to be done in monospecific displays where
specimens cannot touch each other. Aggressive protein skimming,
chemical filtration and water exchanges are necessary and critical
to reduce complications, not the least of which will be from allelopathy.
Simple divisions of corals attach
best if healthy tissue is placed downward (believe it or not) in
contact with the intended substrate for settlement. Damaged tissue
and exposed skeleton should be oriented upward to receive optimum
light and current for expeditious healing. The colony will soon
grow to a natural shape with available light and water flow.
When selecting materials for use
in coral farming, please be conscientious that you should be utilizing
items with the lowest possible environmental impact. When using
plastics, try to employ materials in techniques that are re-usable
(releasable cable ties, slip knots on constrictive ties, even asking
your friends/customers to send back floral picks, etc. that will
not be recycled). This is especially important for larger farming
operations with consideration for the burden already placed on limited
resources, when recycling will obviously contribute to profits on
the bottom line. Live rock and dry ancient reef rock ("tuffa"/carbonate
rock from land) hardly qualify as low impact materials. Indeed,
limestone/aragonite for making cement plugs and the like are also
products of a defined, limited and non-renewable resource: ancient
reef deposits. Whenever possible, utilize inevitable byproducts
like bio-rubble from live rock shipments or recyclable plastics.
There are many ways, of course,
to practice responsible aquariology. People must necessarily exploit
natural resources, but it can be done responsibly and with consideration
and great empathy. I present this as a challenge especially for
aquarists and other consumers of coral reef aquarium products who
intend to fill their displays with mostly or only captive propagated
specimens. Indeed, low impact systems are becoming common, and I
suspect that zero-impact reef displays will be an everyday reality
in the near future. The progress that aquarists have made in just
a matter of years… barely decades, from the perception of
live corals from being mysterious and impossible to sustain in captivity
to a point now in time where their overgrowth has become an issue
in husbandry is testimony to the passion and dedication of reef
enthusiasts. I wish the best of luck to you in all of your honest
endeavors.
With kind regards,
Anthony Calfo
About the author:
Anthony Calfo is a life-time aquarist and hobby author, having published
books and numerous articles on aquatic science and aquariology. He has
presented lectures and workshops to organizations and events for more
than a decade and can be reached daily for comment and questions on message
boards around the world. For books or more information, you can find him
at http://www.marinedepot.com/FORUMS/
|
|